Endilll wrote: [Mozilla](https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/code-quality/coding-style/coding_style_cpp.html), [WebKit](https://webkit.org/code-style-guidelines/), [GCC](https://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html#Cxx_Conventions), [Microsoft](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/fundamentals/coding-style/coding-conventions), and [Chromium](https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/styleguide/c++/c++.md) doesn't appear to be opinionated on attributes at all.
[Google](https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppguide.html) is the only one mentioning attributes at all: > Attributes, and macros that expand to attributes, appear at the very > beginning of the function declaration or definition, before the return type: >```cpp > ABSL_ATTRIBUTE_NOINLINE void ExpensiveFunction(); > [[nodiscard]] bool IsOk(); >``` I'm not sure which `BreakAfterAttributes` option this boils down to, but I don't mind setting it back to `Never` for Google style if reviewers would like me to do so. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70360 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
