gustedt wrote: Hi, yes the really bad choice here is by gcc to have the same name for basically two different attributes. For the value, they also missed the opportunity to do something sensible when moving to C++ attributes, what a pitty.
For a concrete guideline in that jungle, when (= which version) do you expect this patch to hit distribution? Will it be in clang-18 once that is released? Can we expect a similar feature, let's Call it clang::deallocator_function in a future version? Thanks Jens -- Jens Gustedt - INRIA & ICube, Strasbourg, France https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68059 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
