gustedt wrote:

Hi, 
yes the really bad choice here is by gcc to have the same name for basically 
two different attributes.
For the value, they also missed the opportunity to do something sensible when 
moving to C++ attributes, what a pitty. 

For a concrete guideline in that jungle, when (= which version) do you expect 
this patch to hit distribution? Will it be in clang-18 once that is released?

Can we expect a similar feature, let's Call it clang::deallocator_function in a 
future version?
Thanks
 Jens
-- 
Jens Gustedt - INRIA & ICube, Strasbourg, France 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68059
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to