rnk wrote: > Do we really need to have all 4 variants of the 3 fortran runtime libraries? > That's a lot of complexity. Can we pare it down to just static/dynamic? It's > also sometimes possible to generate code that works in both the static and > dynamic context, depending on what is in those libraries. We don't create 4 > variants of clang_rt.builtins, for examle.
>From glancing at the fortran runtime code, I think the answer is probably >"no". There is too much C++ standard library usage. If you wish to avoid this >build complexity, you may consider writing code in the STL-less style that is >used for C++ code in the sanitizers in compiler-rt. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70833 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
