xazax.hun added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D25429#565940, @NoQ wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D25429#565939, @xazax.hun wrote: > > > I might be confused, but as far as I remember, when you do static linking, > > symbols tend to be linked in lazily. So as long as you do not use the > > matchers, those numbers might be misleading. > > > Yep, i did actually obtain these numbers by using matchers in one of the > checkers. Great! I am in favour of this change. I wonder, however, if it is worth to ask this on the mailing list as well. https://reviews.llvm.org/D25429 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
