================
@@ -1724,6 +1724,33 @@ TEST(InlayHints, RestrictRange) {
ElementsAre(labelIs(": int"), labelIs(": char")));
}
+TEST(ParameterHints, PseudoObjectExpr) {
+ Annotations Code(R"cpp(
+ struct S {
+ __declspec(property(get=GetX, put=PutX)) int x[];
+ int GetX(int y, int z) { return 42 + y; }
+ void PutX(int y) { x = $one[[y]]; } // FIXME: Undesired `x = y: y` for
this ill-formed expression.
----------------
zyn0217 wrote:
Sorry, I'm a bit inaccurate here: The assignment expression in `PutX` is not
ill-formed but would expand to a recursive call to `PutX` since we're assigning
to the member with the very setter. (Of course, this would end up crashing if
we [run the program](https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/e3fW3W73a).)
I think I was suggesting that this is a bad case for supporting such an
extension: the assignment expression could be of a syntactic form with an
inappropriate hint location though.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71366
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
