dwblaikie wrote: > I did have a related RFC, but the > [proposal](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-improving-clangs-middle-and-back-end-diagnostics/69261/16?u=nickdesaulniers) > from @rnk is a yak shave that I don't intend to pursue.
I'd push on that a bit more. As I mentioned on the phab review, I think it'd be unfortunate to build a second system for tracking inlining apart from the debug info. Guess it comes down to whether some sufficient quorum insist on that being necessary yak shaving here or not. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73552 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
