bwendling wrote:

> Hey, that looks pretty good! I'm surprised it wasn't too much more work to 
> convert to generating the GEP directly. Nice job!
> 
> Does this change result in codegen differences in IR? (was expecting test 
> changes that used "fork" loads and "bork" GEPs)

Thanks. There will be. There's an issue I need to hammer out with the 
"union_of_fams". I wanted to get everyone's opinion on this method though 
before I invested a ton more time on it first. :-)

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73730
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to