================
@@ -92,14 +94,14 @@ namespace ImplicitCapture {
[] { return ref_i; }; // expected-error {{variable 'ref_i' cannot be
implicitly captured in a lambda with no capture-default specified}}
expected-note {{lambda expression begins here}} expected-note 2 {{capture
'ref_i' by}} expected-note 2 {{default capture by}}
static int j;
- int &ref_j = j;
- [] { return ref_j; }; // ok
+ int &ref_j = j; // cxx03-fixme-note {{declared here}}
+ [] { return ref_j; }; // cxx03-fixme-error {{variable 'ref_j' cannot be
implicitly captured in a lambda with no capture-default specified}}
cxx03-fixme-note 4 {{capture}} cxx03-fixme-note {{lambda expression begins
here}}
----------------
philnik777 wrote:
Ah OK. So this diagnostic is actually correct, since an `int&` is not usable in
a constant expression in C++03. Or am I misunderstanding more?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73376
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
