sebpop added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D24991#565861, @EricWF wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D24991#565715, @mclow.lists wrote: > > > How does this play with existing binaries? Applications that expect these > > functions to exist in the dylib? > > > This patch is majorly ABI breaking, although we could probably find a > formulation that wasn't. Eric, Marshall, any suggestions on how to fix the backwards compatibility issue? Thanks! Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D24991 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
