xu-chiheng wrote: > I don't know what issue/regression you're referring to. Please explain, in > detail, what the issue is and all the relevant aspects of your configuration. > Also explain what the suggested fix does, and how it handles the various > cases (I just tested building latest llvm-project main with Clang 15 and LLD, > for a mingw target, and it worked just fine, both as a regular non-dylib > build, and with `LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB` enabled.) > > I also believe that the suggested patch would break actual use of clang-repl; > if `LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB` or `LLVM_BUILD_SHARED_LIBS` aren't defined, then > those symbols wouldn't be dllexported at all. This causes them to not be > found at runtime when the JIT runtime tries to locate them.
> I don't know what issue/regression you're referring to. Please explain, in > detail, what the issue is and all the relevant aspects of your configuration. > Also explain what the suggested fix does, and how it handles the various > cases (I just tested building latest llvm-project main with Clang 15 and LLD, > for a mingw target, and it worked just fine, both as a regular non-dylib > build, and with `LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB` enabled.) > > I also believe that the suggested patch would break actual use of clang-repl; > if `LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB` or `LLVM_BUILD_SHARED_LIBS` aren't defined, then > those symbols wouldn't be dllexported at all. This causes them to not be > found at runtime when the JIT runtime tries to locate them. I have build scripts and patches at: https://github.com/xu-chiheng/Note https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74982 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
