nikic wrote:

> Most all the recommended changes assume the code paths will work equally well 
> for vector types as they do for scalar types. Can we be so sure this is the 
> case? This is why I opted to keep the casting assertions with the exception 
> of a few places where I could be sure the code path was clean.

I don't think any of those code paths would cause a silent miscompile with 
vectors, which is the only thing we have to be concerned about (if it just hits 
a different assertion, that's fine).

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75217
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to