================
@@ -349,16 +349,24 @@ multiclass VPseudoSiFiveVMACC<string mx, VReg vd_type, 
VReg vs2_type,
       : VPseudoTernaryNoMaskWithPolicy<vd_type, V_M1.vrclass, vs2_type, 
Constraint>;
 }
 
-multiclass VPseudoSiFiveVQMACC<string Constraint = ""> {
+multiclass VPseudoSiFiveVQMACCDOD<string Constraint = ""> {
   foreach m = MxListVF8 in
     let VLMul = m.value in
     defm NAME : VPseudoSiFiveVMACC<m.MX, m.vrclass, m.vrclass, Constraint>;
 }
 
+multiclass VPseudoSiFiveVQMACCQOQ<string Constraint = ""> {
+  foreach i = [0, 1, 2, 3] in
+    let VLMul = MxListVF4[i].value in
+    defm NAME : VPseudoSiFiveVMACC<MxListVF8[i].MX, MxListVF8[i].vrclass,
----------------
topperc wrote:

The .MX passed to the first template argument should match VLMul. It's used to 
form the name of the PseudoInstruction. That name should be the same as the 
VLMul value.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75768
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to