HazardyKnusperkeks wrote: > Thanks for doing this. Does it mean we would have to add every type we use to > our config? It would be much more convenient if clang-format treated the > argument list the same way that it treats in definitions. For example > > ```shell > printf "int\niso_time(time_t) { return 1; }\n" | clang-format -style='{ > AlwaysBreakAfterReturnType: All }' > ``` > > gives > > ```c > int > iso_time(time_t) { > return 1; > } > ``` > > whereas > > ```shell > printf "int\niso_time(time_t);\n" | clang-format -style='{ > AlwaysBreakAfterReturnType: All }' > ``` > > will need a config edit to work. >
`clang-format` doesn't know what are types, except for the keywords. So there is no way to decide if this is a function declaration without naming the parameters, or a variable declaration with a constructor call. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76206 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits