DonatNagyE wrote: Hmm, I would prefer a cleaner, more "theoretical" improvement of the equivalence class handling instead of this "add yet another patch that covers many, but not all cases" approach.
I'm not opposed to landing this PR in llvm-18 (we have it, and it improves the user experience), but I wouldn't like to have it in llvm-19 and later. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71284 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
