================
@@ -2164,6 +2164,12 @@ bool Driver::HandleImmediateArgs(const Compilation &C) {
     return false;
   }
 
+  if (C.getArgs().hasArg(options::OPT_print_library_module_manifest_path)) {
+    llvm::outs() << "module: ="
----------------
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:

But "module: =" doesn't look like an error value too. And I feel it just adds 
the work the tool vendors need to do. @mathstuf @boris-kolpackov do you have an 
opinion here?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76451
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to