================ @@ -2164,6 +2164,12 @@ bool Driver::HandleImmediateArgs(const Compilation &C) { return false; } + if (C.getArgs().hasArg(options::OPT_print_library_module_manifest_path)) { + llvm::outs() << "module: =" ---------------- ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
But "module: =" doesn't look like an error value too. And I feel it just adds the work the tool vendors need to do. @mathstuf @boris-kolpackov do you have an opinion here? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76451 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits