Zonotora wrote: > Please add test coverage for compound assignment and increment/decrement. > > This seems like a reasonable extension of the existing integer truncation > checks, but we might want to consider giving it a unique name. Otherwise, > people using integer truncation checks will have trouble upgrading their > compiler.
Sure 👍 Fair enough, what name do you suggest? Replace "integer" with "bitfield" as in `implicit-unsigned-bitfield-truncation`, `implicit-signed-bitfield-truncation` and `implicit-bitfield-sign-change`? Or just have a single flag `implicit-bitfield-conversion` for now? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75481 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
