phoebewang wrote: > Making avx512f the only case where avx512vl can be disabled doesn't seem like > too much of a stretch to me - we'd be merely making all avx512 extension > features depend on avx512vl.
Agreed. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75580 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits