asb wrote: The conclusion from the previous review was this was OK to merge. I think I held it up by not responding to a ping (apologies). I've had another scan through and don't see a problem with merging this and considering it experimental once Craig's review comments are addressed.
For the psABI, there's a gap here I think as GCC and LLVM need to deviate from what is currently written. I think https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/pull/257 tried to partially address this. I wonder if we need a tracking issue in that repo to try to get this properly documented via that PR or otherwise (what do you think @jrtc27 @kito-cheng?). https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76777 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
