chfast wrote: > But in future it would be useful to mark whole gap there as skipped instead. > If there is interest I would do it in another PR.
This would be very useful not to treat compile-time unreachable code as uncovered. Can the skipped code be marked separately in the reports? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77214 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
