================
@@ -1698,8 +1698,6 @@ FormatStyle getGoogleStyle(FormatStyle::LanguageKind
Language) {
/*BasedOnStyle=*/"google",
},
};
- GoogleStyle.AttributeMacros.push_back("GUARDED_BY");
----------------
ilya-biryukov wrote:
@HazardyKnusperkeks friendly ping. Any thoughts on including a few more
attributes into the (the first list of 4 elements) vs landing this change and
relying on implicit formatting of those as function names?
I am happy to choose one of the two options arbitrarily, but I don't have
enough context on `clang-format` to understand which approach is preferable, so
I would love to get an opinion from someone in the `clang-format` community.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76804
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
