================ @@ -42,6 +42,28 @@ namespace dr1611 { // dr1611: dup 1658 C c; } +namespace dr1626 { // dr1626: no open +// FIXME: current consensus for CWG2335 is that the examples are well-formed. ---------------- Endilll wrote:
Intent expressed in P1787 in PR description seems rather clear to me, as well as its application to CWG1626, but I don't insist. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77444 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits