================
@@ -42,6 +42,28 @@ namespace dr1611 { // dr1611: dup 1658
C c;
}
+namespace dr1626 { // dr1626: no open
+// FIXME: current consensus for CWG2335 is that the examples are well-formed.
----------------
Endilll wrote:
Intent expressed in P1787 in PR description seems rather clear to me, as well
as its application to CWG1626, but I don't insist.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77444
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
