MaskRay wrote: > I guess we we should avoid ClUseStackSafety for -O0
There may be two competing goals. The traditional one that `-O0` should run very few optimizations and a practical one that instrumentations should reduce code size increase. `[asan] Skip promotable allocas to improve performance at -O0` runs at `-O0`. (#77221 is discussing whether it should run at `-O0`). We have other optimizations e.g. within a basic block, two addresses do not need to be instrumented repeatedly unless they are separated by a call instruction. Perhaps it isn't too bad to run StackSafetyAnalysis at -O0 for consistent with other -O levels? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77210 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
