================
@@ -132,6 +142,36 @@ namespace dr2126 { // dr2126: 12
#endif
}
+namespace dr2137 { // dr2137: 18
+#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
+ struct Q {
+ Q();
+ Q(Q&&);
+ Q(std::initializer_list<Q>) = delete; // since-cxx11-note 2 {{has been
explicitly marked deleted here}}
+ };
+
+ Q x = Q { Q() }; // since-cxx11-error {{call to deleted constructor}}
+
+ int f(Q); // since-cxx11-note {{passing argument to parameter here}}
+ int y = f({ Q() }); // since-cxx11-error {{call to deleted constructor}}
----------------
Endilll wrote:
Can you follow the example of test for CWG2141? Specifically,
1. not trimming diagnostic messages (including identifiers);
2. placing expected errors on the following line (via `//
since-cxx11-error@-1`);
3. grouping notes together with errors the same way they are grouped in console
output (2170 is a good example how to handle notes that point to a different
source line).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77768
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
