HighCommander4 wrote: > What do you think about this as an alternative: if `spelledForExpanded` > receives as input an expanded token range `[firstExpanded, lastExpanded]` > where `lastExpanded` is the `eof` token, return the spelled tokens > corresponding to `[firstExpanded, lastExpanded - 1]` instead? (In the case > where the `eof` token is the only one in the range, we could return nullopt.) > > This would have the advantage of gracefully handling AST nodes like this one > whose end location is the `eof`, and return all the spelled tokens actually > making up the node.
I wrote this up at https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78092 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69849 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
