kkwli wrote: > > How would `flang-new -fno-fortran-main t.f -lFortran_main` work? > > Good question. This won't work with this patch but currently should work. > I'll have to fix this. > > Do you agree that `flang-new -lFortran_main` is something we want to make > work?
In my opinion, we should hide 'libFortran_main' as much as possible since it is really an implementation detail. I can see that the proposed behavior will give users less surprise. I am slightly in favor of this behavior. In a long run, I still think that we need to get rid of `Fortran_main`. Perhaps, for the minimal, we can rename it to remove `Fortran` in the name to make people think that it is not required (by the users) to do any linking for Fortran code. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78152 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
