luporl wrote: > > Apart from that, the other difference that I'm aware is that on non-Darwin > > targets -isysroot only sets the sysroot for the includes, while -sysroot > > also affects the libraries. > > Sounds like in practice it wouldn’t make much difference whether it’s > -isysroot or -sysroot?
Right, but adding support for -sysroot too would have 2 main benefits: - Make it possible to override DEFAULT_SYSROOT. - Make it possible for other targets (non-Darwin) to set the sysroot. My plan is the following: - Try to fix isysroot.f90 test by making DEFAULT_SYSROOT a LIT "feature". - Keep using -isysroot on Flang's tests, on Darwin, as it seems to be the recommended way to select an SDK. - Add support for -sysroot. Does it look good? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77365 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
