asb wrote: CC @jyknight who can hopefully confirm if my interpretation is correct. Based on your comment on #77814, perhaps the expectation is that libatomic would have a lock-free implementation for any __sync calls used up to the max atomic width (e.g. lr/sc based if there's no AMO instructions)?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77424 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
