================
@@ -663,54 +668,40 @@ struct MCDCCoverageBuilder {
 private:
   CodeGenModule &CGM;
 
-  llvm::SmallVector<MCDCConditionID> AndRHS;
-  llvm::SmallVector<MCDCConditionID> OrRHS;
-  llvm::SmallVector<const BinaryOperator *> NestLevel;
+  llvm::SmallVector<DecisionIDPair, 6> DecisionStack;
   llvm::DenseMap<const Stmt *, MCDCConditionID> &CondIDs;
   llvm::DenseMap<const Stmt *, unsigned> &MCDCBitmapMap;
   MCDCConditionID NextID = 1;
   bool NotMapped = false;
 
+  /// Represent a sentinel value of [0,0] for the bottom of DecisionStack.
+  static constexpr DecisionIDPair DecisionIDPairSentinel{0, 0};
----------------
chapuni wrote:

Is "`DecisionStackSentinel`" better?

I think it would be more descriptive to move it onto the definition of 
`DecisionStack`.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78202
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to