pogo59 wrote: > When a macro is merely an alternate name for an intrinsic function, does it > want to be documented as its own intrinsic function? I assume yes in this > patch, but if there's a different tactic that avoids duplicating a bunch of > descriptions, I'm open to suggestions.
I discovered the \see directive and added those. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78613 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
