sdkrystian wrote: @cor3ntin I changed the diagnostic to a pedantic warning and added a release note.
> I wonder if we should add tests for > https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/1707.html in this patch. We don't check for the template keyword when parsing an _elaborated-type-specifier_ without a _nested-name-specifier_, so such a declaration is parsed as an unnamed class. I feel that it's beyond the scope of this PR anyways, as this is only concerned with qualified declarations. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78595 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
