hfinkel added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D25403#580416, @jlebar wrote:
> > Is this because the functions are in <cmath> instead of in <complex> are > > you don't want to mark all of <cmath> as host/device? > > Yes. cmath is its own beast; we need to have our own implementation of it in > order to direct the std functions to the appropriate low-level device > functions. (And even if this could somehow be made to work with libc++, we'd > still need it for libstdc++, so doing it one way, even if it's horrible, is > very likely preferable to doing it two ways.) Okay. Why not fix the Clang builtins so that they're evaluatable for constant inputs in a constexpr context? Then we can do this and test the change. https://reviews.llvm.org/D25403 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
