Endilll wrote: @cor3ntin During our offline discussion with @AaronBallman, points "we don't want to read tea leaves" and "CWG can change their opinion" were repeated so often, that I thought we have consensus on using only official source on information, i.e. issue list. I also don't see why it's so necessary to be ahead of the committee when it requires insider knowledge.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78836 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
