Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67...@github.com>


================
@@ -8938,6 +8957,11 @@ static void processTypeAttrs(TypeProcessingState &state, 
QualType &type,
       attr.setUsedAsTypeAttr();
       break;
     }
+    case ParsedAttr::AT_RequiresCapability: {
+      HandleRequiresCapabilityAttr(state, type, attr);
+      attr.setUsedAsTypeAttr();
+      break;
+    }
----------------
erichkeane wrote:

There were a few changes there recently... i wonder if it is time to just 
accept that we're going all-in on trailing-storage for this type.  We're now 
doing it for the ARM SVE types, plus the 'lesser used' structure, so perhaps 
the 'capability pointer' can end up there too.  WDYT?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67095
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to