================ @@ -9108,7 +9123,8 @@ bool Sema::CheckExplicitlyDefaultedComparison(Scope *S, FunctionDecl *FD, // declaration, it is implicitly considered to be constexpr. // FIXME: Only applying this to the first declaration seems problematic, as // simple reorderings can affect the meaning of the program. - if (First && !FD->isConstexpr() && Info.Constexpr) + if ((First && !FD->isConstexpr() && Info.Constexpr) || + getLangOpts().CPlusPlus23) ---------------- cor3ntin wrote:
isn't `Info.Constexpr` always true in c++ mode? I'm trying to think of a meaningful test. Haybe calling a comparison function of a class with a non-literal member from a consteval function? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77753 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
