================
@@ -217,10 +217,11 @@ enum ProcessorFeatures {
FEATURE_SM3,
FEATURE_SHA512,
FEATURE_SM4,
- // FEATURE_APX_F,
- FEATURE_USERMSR = 112,
- // FEATURE_AVX10_1_256,
- // FEATURE_AVX10_1_512,
+ //FIXME: gcc used string "apxf" instead of "egpr"
----------------
FreddyLeaf wrote:
Yes, the concern is from that gcc use `apxf` but not `egpr`. I don't think
adding one more line like this is complete safe. I prefer to not touch APX firs
and refine it in another PR, WDYT?
```
X86_FEATURE_COMPAT(EGPR, "apxf", 0)
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79086
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
