alexfh wrote: > This is mostly just a call to coordinate a bit better. I would suggest that > if the patch author is engaged on the thread, it would make sense to tell > them the schedule on which you plan to revert so they have an opportunity to > tell you if that's going to be disruptive.
This part captures one particular issue with my way of action I happened to miss. Thanks for putting this clearly @AaronBallman! Coordination was indeed far from perfect here. And your suggestion totally makes sense. > While I realize this is the 'policy', I'm asking for compassion, particularly > with new developers who are engaging. This is also a good point @erichkeane. I'll try to consider this as well. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77768 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
