================
@@ -1414,7 +1414,7 @@ namespace dr96 { // dr96: no
     // FIXME: This is ill-formed, because 'f' is not a template-id and does not
----------------
Endilll wrote:

@opensdh Thank you for the clarification. I guess I read 
[N1528](https://wg21.link/n1528)
Would it be a correct statement to make that you deprecated the following case 
described in that paper?
> Consequently, the recommendation of this paper is: If the template keyword is 
> followed by a name that does not have a template-argument-list, the name must 
> refer to a class template and be used in a context in which a class template 
> is valid, otherwise the program is ill-formed. 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80801
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to