================ @@ -1414,7 +1414,7 @@ namespace dr96 { // dr96: no // FIXME: This is ill-formed, because 'f' is not a template-id and does not ---------------- Endilll wrote:
@opensdh Thank you for the clarification. I guess I read [N1528](https://wg21.link/n1528) Would it be a correct statement to make that you deprecated the following case described in that paper? > Consequently, the recommendation of this paper is: If the template keyword is > followed by a name that does not have a template-argument-list, the name must > refer to a class template and be used in a context in which a class template > is valid, otherwise the program is ill-formed. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80801 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits