================ @@ -1637,10 +1637,8 @@ def err_inline_namespace_std : Error< def err_unexpected_friend : Error< "friends can only be classes or functions">; def ext_enum_friend : ExtWarn< - "befriending enumeration type %0 is a C++11 extension">, InGroup<CXX11>; -def warn_cxx98_compat_enum_friend : Warning< - "befriending enumeration type %0 is incompatible with C++98">, - InGroup<CXX98Compat>, DefaultIgnore; + "elaborated enumeration type cannot be a friend">, ---------------- Endilll wrote:
> This isn't quite correct either because enum can follow the friend keyword 😛, > e.g. Ugh, you are right. I think it even defeats your initial suggestions, which read `A friend declaration cannot use an elaborated type specifier starting with enum`, because it can when befriending a function, as you just showed. I guess no way around standardese then: `Elaborated type specifier cannot be used to befriend an enumeration. Consider omitting 'enum' keyword`. I'd like the wording to be accurate on terminology, yet actionable for users who are not well-versed in standardese. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80171 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
