Sirraide wrote: > We have 2 options: > > * Wait for llvm to get improve their handling of assumption based > optimizations. > * Proceed with this work hoping this encourages work on the optimizer.
The standard also mentions that `__has_cpp_attribute` should return `0` ‘if an implementation does not attempt to deduce any such information from assumptions’ [dcl.attr.assume], so another option would be to just have it set to `0` for the time being and just not emit anything until that’s not an issue anymore. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81014 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
