================ @@ -1637,10 +1637,8 @@ def err_inline_namespace_std : Error< def err_unexpected_friend : Error< "friends can only be classes or functions">; def ext_enum_friend : ExtWarn< - "befriending enumeration type %0 is a C++11 extension">, InGroup<CXX11>; -def warn_cxx98_compat_enum_friend : Warning< - "befriending enumeration type %0 is incompatible with C++98">, - InGroup<CXX98Compat>, DefaultIgnore; + "elaborated enumeration type cannot be a friend">, ---------------- sdkrystian wrote:
> > ISO C++ does not permits this declaration to be declared as friend because > > 'enum E' is an elaborated enum specifier. > > There. Something along these lines Not a huge fan of this phrasing. The wording of the diagnostic should already imply that such a declaration is invalid. Moreover: - "elaborated enum specifier" isn't any "more correct" than "elaborated enum type" - "declaration to be declared" is a bit redundant - the phrasing implies that the declaration might be well-formed when written without `friend` (which it isn't). https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80171 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits