AtariDreams wrote: > Okay, your description of the change here is very misleading; it doesn't even > mention that this is specific to having an `@implementation` for every > intermediate class. > > Your test seems completely inadequate — you need to test that we're doing the > static layout properly, and you need to test with ivars coming from a variety > of different places, including: > > * ivars declared in the `@interface` > * ivars declared in the `@implementation` > * ivars synthesized explicitly in the `@implementation` > * vars synthesized implicitly in the `@implementation`
So this is a way to check for static linked; if the compiler can see the @implementation, right? Only then can we "opt-out" of the non-fragile ABI like NSObject and its subclasses do, right? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81335 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
