[clang] [Clang] Unify interface for accessing template arguments as written for class/variable template specializations (PR #81642)

[Krystian Stasiowski via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -6316,6 +6310,15 @@ TEST(HasAnyTemplateArgumentLoc, 
BindsToSpecializationWithDoubleArgument) {
                       hasTypeLoc(loc(asString("double")))))))))));
 }
 
+TEST(HasAnyTemplateArgumentLoc, BindsToExplicitSpecializationWithIntArgument) {
+  EXPECT_TRUE(
+      matches("template<typename T> class A {}; template<> class A<int> {};",
+              classTemplateSpecializationDecl(
+                  hasName("A"), hasAnyTemplateArgument(templateArgument(
+                                    refersToType(asString("int")))))));
+}
+
+#if 0
----------------
sdkrystian wrote:

Oh, hah. I was checking whether we could still match class template 
specializations based on template arguments. The commented out tests should be 
replaced with equivalents written using the above syntax (where it makes sense).

So to answer your question, it's from local testing :)

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81642
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits