================ @@ -2742,6 +2742,19 @@ bool Parser::parseMisplacedModuleImport() { return false; } +void Parser::diagnoseUseOfC11Keyword(const Token& Tok) { + // Warn that this is a C11 extension if in an older mode or if in C++. + // Otherwise, warn that it is incompatible with standards before C11 if in + // C11 or later. + unsigned DiagId; + if (!getLangOpts().C11) { + DiagId = diag::ext_c11_feature; + } else { + DiagId = diag::warn_c11_compat_keyword; + } + Diag(Tok, DiagId) << Tok.getName(); ---------------- erichkeane wrote:
I dont think it is worth the DiagId pattern here, I think just a Diag + Ternary is probably fine. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82015 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits