mzyKi wrote: > That would make the behavior consistent with the behavior for other explicit > object functions (deducing this). > To illustrate we have the following code, the AST and produced CallEvent are > different:
Thanks for your help very much.I only fixed the symptoms of this bug without spending much time to find the root cause. I feel ashamed. But I am not sure whether this change has some side effect.```MD->isInstance()``` replaced with ```MD->isImplicitObjectMemberFunction()``` will miss some cases create ```<CXXMemberOperatorCall>``` in my opinion.Will these missing cases unnecessary? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83585 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
