Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com>, Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com> Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83...@github.com>
AaronBallman wrote: > But that's not the problem I have in mind. My problem is the other way > around: when `ByteCodeExprGen` needs to generate code for statements. It has > no `visitStmt` function, because that's only implemented in the subclass. Ah, so the choices boil down to using a single interface like this, or doing something like CRTP (or virtual dispatch)? I like the separation of concerns between the stmt and expr emitters, but I'm not opposed to unifying them. How ugly does CRTP get though? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83683 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
