FreddyLeaf wrote: > > > Still not understand. Shouldn't the target feature of the caller be > > > passed to the intrinsic when checking the argument of the intrinsic? > > > > > > The target features passing from option can be passed to Semachecking. It's > > special for attribute_target, which is handled in `handleTargetAttr`, which > > is after Sema::CheckBuiltinFunctionCall. > > Then why not move the call `handleTargetAttr` before > `Sema::CheckBuiltinFunctionCall`?
Mainly because all Sema::CheckBuiltinFunctionCall before doesn't dependent on target feature, right? We don't have any other builtins have different range limit of same const parameter. But clang::CodegenFunction has the information of the whole function, which I think is a more reasonable place to do the check. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84136 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
