Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84...@github.com>
================
@@ -28,11 +28,26 @@ class Block;
class DeadBlock;
class Pointer;
class Context;
+template <unsigned A, bool B> class Integral;
enum PrimType : unsigned;
class Pointer;
inline llvm::raw_ostream &operator<<(llvm::raw_ostream &OS, const Pointer &P);
+struct BlockPointer {
+ /// The block the pointer is pointing to.
+ Block *Pointee;
+ /// Start of the current subfield.
+ unsigned Base;
+};
+
+struct IntPointer {
+ const Descriptor *Desc;
+ int Value;
----------------
tbaederr wrote:
I was wondering about that... shouldn't it be a `uint64_t`? For the case where
we're on a 32 bit host and compile for a 64 bit target?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84159
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
