erichkeane wrote: > If we can come to a consensus as to what to do w/ `clang::assume` and > `__attribute__((assume))` reasonably soon, then I’ll handle `[[omp::assume]]` > in this pr as well; otherwise, I’ll open a pr for `[[omp::assume]]` tomorrow > or so.
This patch is big enough as it is, as far as LOC and what effect, I would prefer we split the OMP decisions off to a separate patch and discuss that /implemetn that there. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81014 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
