gamesh411 wrote:

As keeping the trivial change that this PR was before, and thanks to the fact 
that the checker needed a major overhaul, I have increased the scope of this 
change to support the use cases mentioned by @balazske.
That is why I am re-requesting a review.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80029
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to