pulehui wrote: > @pulehui I will not merge this patch now since it does not really solve the > whole riscv issue. As @4ast commented above, the verifier made btf_func_model > to jit. > [snip] > So you will know whether it is a struct or signed or not. If you feel you > need explicit UNSIGNED flag, you can add it in btf as well. > > Let us try to resolve the issue in riscv backend. Thanks!
Thanks Yonghong and Alexei, will try to resolve this incompatibility between bpf abi and riscv abi. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84874 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
